Skip to main content

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Risk factor for childhood lead exposure: Pre-1950 Housing

Select a County
Measurement Period: 2015
This indicator measures the percent of pre-1950 housing units out of the number of residential housing units in a geographic area.

Why is this important?

While all children in New Jersey are at risk of exposure to lead, children who reside in homes build prior to 1950 are at elevated risk due to the potential presence of leaded paint. Major sources of lead exposure to children are: peeling or deteriorated leaded paint; lead-contaminated dust created by renovation or removal of lead-containing paint; and lead contamination brought home by adults who work in an occupation that involves lead, or who engage in a hobby where lead is used. Children are more vulnerable to lead poisoning than adults. The first six years of life are the time when the brain grows the fastest, and when the critical connections in the brain and nervous system that control thought, learning, hearing, movement, behavior and emotions are formed. The normal behavior of very young children (crawling, exploring, teething, and putting objects in their mouth) exposes young children to lead that is present in their environment.
More...
Select a comparison
Loading...

Risk factor for childhood lead exposure: Pre-1950 Housing

:
Comparison:
Measurement Period: 2015
Data Source: NJSHAD
November 21, 2024www.njhealthmatters.org
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
18.3%
20.5%
31.3%
35.3%
37.4%
% Housing units built pre-1950
Sort by Trend Sort by Change from Prior Value
County Source Period % Housing units built pre-1950
There are 5 County values. The lowest value is 18.3%, and the highest value is 37.4%. Half of the values are between 18.3% and 31.3%. The middle (median) value is 31.3%.

Data Source

  • NJSHAD
    Maintained By: North Jersey Health Collaborative

Filed under: Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants, Children