Search for Indicators
Demographics Dashboard
The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Sussex
Population
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Total Population
County: Sussex Total Population
146,132
People
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (146,132) is greater than the previously measured value (145,575).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(145,575)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Age and Sex
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Population Under Age 5
County: Sussex Population Under Age 5
4.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (5.6%), Sussex has a value of 4.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Sussex has a value of 4.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (4.7%) is greater than the previously measured value (4.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population Under Age 18
County: Sussex Population Under Age 18
19.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (21.5%), Sussex has a value of 19.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Sussex has a value of 19.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (19.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population Over Age 65
County: Sussex Population Over Age 65
19.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (17.4%), Sussex has a value of 19.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Sussex has a value of 19.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (19.2%) is greater than the previously measured value (18.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Female Population
County: Sussex Female Population
49.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (50.7%), Sussex has a value of 49.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Sussex has a value of 49.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (49.6%) is less than the previously measured value (49.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(49.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Male Population
County: Sussex Male Population
50.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (49.3%), Sussex has a value of 50.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Sussex has a value of 50.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (50.4%) is greater than the previously measured value (50.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(50.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Race and Hispanic Origin
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Population White
County: Sussex Population White
92.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (70.7%), Sussex has a value of 92.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Sussex has a value of 92.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (92.2%) is less than the previously measured value (92.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(92.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population Black or African American
County: Sussex Population Black or African American
3.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (15.4%), Sussex has a value of 3.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(15.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Sussex has a value of 3.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (3.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (3.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population American Indian and Alaska Native
County: Sussex Population American Indian and Alaska Native
0.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (0.7%), Sussex has a value of 0.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(0.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Sussex has a value of 0.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (0.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population Asian
County: Sussex Population Asian
2.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (10.5%), Sussex has a value of 2.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Sussex has a value of 2.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (2.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (2.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
County: Sussex Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (0.1%), Sussex has a value of 0.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Sussex has a value of 0.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (0.1%) is greater than the previously measured value (0.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population Two or More Races
County: Sussex Population Two or More Races
1.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (2.4%), Sussex has a value of 1.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Sussex has a value of 1.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (1.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population Hispanic or Latino
County: Sussex Population Hispanic or Latino
11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (21.9%), Sussex has a value of 11.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Sussex has a value of 11.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (11.6%) is greater than the previously measured value (10.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
County: Sussex Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
82.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (52.9%), Sussex has a value of 82.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Sussex has a value of 82.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (82.0%) is less than the previously measured value (83.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(83.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Population Characteristics
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Veteran Population
County: Sussex Veteran Population
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (4.1%), Sussex has a value of 5.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Sussex has a value of 5.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Foreign Born Persons
County: Sussex Foreign Born Persons
8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (23.2%), Sussex has a value of 8.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Sussex has a value of 8.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Housing
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Housing Units
County: Sussex Housing Units
62,843
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (62,843) is less than the previously measured value (62,854).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(62,854)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Homeownership
County: Sussex Homeownership
76.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (58.5%), Sussex has a value of 76.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Sussex has a value of 76.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Median Housing Unit Value
County: Sussex Median Housing Unit Value
$322,300
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of $322,300 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $372,300 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $283,750.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($401,400), Sussex has a value of $322,300 which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
($401,400)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Sussex has a value of $322,300 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
County: Sussex Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
$2,380
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of $2,380 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,519 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,058.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($2,728), Sussex has a value of $2,380 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
NJ Value
($2,728)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Sussex has a value of $2,380 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
County: Sussex Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
$1,057
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of $1,057 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,085 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,327.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($1,175), Sussex has a value of $1,057 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
NJ Value
($1,175)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($584), Sussex has a value of $1,057 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Median Household Gross Rent
County: Sussex Median Household Gross Rent
$1,501
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of $1,501 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,501 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,703.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($1,577), Sussex has a value of $1,501 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
NJ Value
($1,577)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Sussex has a value of $1,501 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Family & Living Arrangements
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Households
County: Sussex Households
56,348
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Average Household Size
County: Sussex Average Household Size
2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (2.60), Sussex has a value of 2.50.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (2.60), Sussex has a value of 2.50.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (32.2%), Sussex has a value of 10.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Sussex has a value of 10.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Education
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Sussex People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
95.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of 95.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 93.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of 95.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (90.6%), Sussex has a value of 95.4% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Sussex has a value of 95.4% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Sussex People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
39.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 38.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (42.3%), Sussex has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Sussex has a value of 39.0% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Persons with a Disability
County: Sussex Persons with a Disability
11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (10.6%), Sussex has a value of 11.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Sussex has a value of 11.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with Health Insurance
County: Sussex Persons with Health Insurance
94.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of 94.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 92.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of 94.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (91.7%), Sussex has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (94.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(94.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sussex
Economy
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Sussex Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
64.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 62.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (61.8%), Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
(61.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Sussex Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
64.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 60.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (60.9%), Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
(60.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Sussex has a value of 64.6% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Total Employment
County: Sussex Total Employment
29,788
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (29,788) is less than the previously measured value (31,867).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(31,867)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Total Employment Change
County: Sussex Total Employment Change
-6.5%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of -6.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than -6.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -8.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of -6.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (-6.5%), Sussex has a value of -6.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(-6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Sussex has a value of -6.5% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (-6.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-0.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(-0.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Sussex Mean Travel Time to Work
36.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of 36.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.7.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of 36.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (31.1), Sussex has a value of 36.6 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
NJ Value
(31.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (26.7), Sussex has a value of 36.6 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Income & Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Median Household Income
County: Sussex Median Household Income
$111,094
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of $111,094 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $92,697 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $82,192.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of $111,094 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($97,126), Sussex has a value of $111,094 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
($97,126)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Sussex has a value of $111,094 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Per Capita Income
County: Sussex Per Capita Income
$54,124
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of $54,124 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $49,666 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $42,448.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of $54,124 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($50,995), Sussex has a value of $54,124 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
($50,995)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Sussex has a value of $54,124 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Sussex People Living Below Poverty Level
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Sussex has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Sussex has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (9.7%), Sussex has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sussex has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Sussex
Businesses
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Employer Establishments
County: Sussex Employer Establishments
3,133
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Sussex (3,133) is greater than the previously measured value (3,093).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(3,093)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Sussex value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.