Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Demographics Dashboard

The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.  

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Union

Population

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Population

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Total Population

Current Value:

County: Union Total Population

572,726
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (572,726) is greater  than the previously measured value (570,417).
Prior Value
(570,417)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Age and Sex

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Age and Sex

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Union Population Under Age 5

6.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (5.6%), Union has a value of 6.1%.
NJ Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), Union has a value of 6.1%.
US Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (6.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Union Population Under Age 18

23.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (21.6%), Union has a value of 23.3%.
NJ Value
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Union has a value of 23.3%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (23.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (23.5%).
Prior Value
(23.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Union Population Over Age 65

15.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (17.7%), Union has a value of 15.6%.
NJ Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Union has a value of 15.6%.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (15.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Female Population

Current Value:

County: Union Female Population

50.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (50.8%), Union has a value of 50.6%.
NJ Value
(50.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.5%), Union has a value of 50.6%.
US Value
(50.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (50.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.6%).
Prior Value
(50.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Male Population

Current Value:

County: Union Male Population

49.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (49.2%), Union has a value of 49.4%.
NJ Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.5%), Union has a value of 49.4%.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (49.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.4%).
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Race and Hispanic Origin

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Race and Hispanic Origin

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Population White

Current Value:

County: Union Population White

66.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (70.4%), Union has a value of 66.2%.
NJ Value
(70.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.3%), Union has a value of 66.2%.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (66.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (66.5%).
Prior Value
(66.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Black or African American

Current Value:
24.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (15.5%), Union has a value of 24.0%.
NJ Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Union has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (24.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (23.9%).
Prior Value
(23.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
1.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (0.8%), Union has a value of 1.0%.
NJ Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Union has a value of 1.0%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (1.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Union Population Asian

6.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (10.6%), Union has a value of 6.3%.
NJ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Union has a value of 6.3%.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (6.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (0.1%), Union has a value of 0.2%.
NJ Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Union has a value of 0.2%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (0.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.2%).
Prior Value
(0.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
2.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (2.5%), Union has a value of 2.4%.
NJ Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Union has a value of 2.4%.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
35.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (22.7%), Union has a value of 35.3%.
NJ Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Union has a value of 35.3%.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (35.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (34.8%).
Prior Value
(34.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
36.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (52.0%), Union has a value of 36.6%.
NJ Value
(52.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), Union has a value of 36.6%.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (36.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (37.1%).
Prior Value
(37.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Population Characteristics

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Population Characteristics

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Union Veteran Population

2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (4.1%), Union has a value of 2.9%.
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Union has a value of 2.9%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Union Foreign Born Persons

31.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (23.2%), Union has a value of 31.6%.
NJ Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Union has a value of 31.6%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Housing

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Housing

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Union Housing Units

213,592
Housing units
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (213,592) is greater  than the previously measured value (212,354).
Prior Value
(212,354)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Union Homeownership

54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (58.5%), Union has a value of 54.9%.
NJ Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Union has a value of 54.9%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:
$458,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $458,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $372,300 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $283,750.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($401,400), Union has a value of $458,000 which is higher and better.
NJ Value
($401,400)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Union has a value of $458,000 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

$3,053
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $3,053 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,519 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,058.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($2,728), Union has a value of $3,053 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
($2,728)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Union has a value of $3,053 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$1,390
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $1,390 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,085 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,327.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($1,175), Union has a value of $1,390 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
($1,175)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Union has a value of $1,390 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$1,570
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $1,570 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,501 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,703.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($1,577), Union has a value of $1,570 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
($1,577)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Union has a value of $1,570 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Family & Living Arrangements

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Family & Living Arrangements

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Households

Current Value:

County: Union Households

199,996
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Union Average Household Size

2.80
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (2.60), Union has a value of 2.80.
NJ Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Union has a value of 2.80.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

45.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (32.2%), Union has a value of 45.6%.
NJ Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Union has a value of 45.6%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Union People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

86.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 86.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 86.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (90.6%), Union has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Union has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
38.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (42.3%), Union has a value of 38.3% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Union has a value of 38.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Persons with a Disability

Current Value:
9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (10.6%), Union has a value of 9.0%.
NJ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Union has a value of 9.0%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
87.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 87.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 87.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (92.0%), Union has a value of 87.4% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (87.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.3%).
Prior Value
(88.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Union

Economy

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
64.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 64.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 64.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (61.8%), Union has a value of 64.5% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(61.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Union has a value of 64.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
63.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (60.9%), Union has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(60.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Union has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Union Total Employment

200,418
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (200,418) is greater  than the previously measured value (187,879).
Prior Value
(187,879)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Union Total Employment Change

6.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 6.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (6.8%), Union has a value of 6.7% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Union has a value of 6.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (6.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-8.4%).
Prior Value
(-8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Union Mean Travel Time to Work

30.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 30.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 30.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.1), Union has a value of 30.6 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(31.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Union has a value of 30.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Income & Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Income & Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Union Median Household Income

$95,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $95,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $92,697 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $82,192.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of $95,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value ($97,126), Union has a value of $95,000 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($97,126)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Union has a value of $95,000 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Union Per Capita Income

$49,666
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $49,666 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $49,666 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $42,448.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of $49,666 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value ($50,995), Union has a value of $49,666 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($50,995)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Union has a value of $49,666 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.7%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Union

Businesses

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Businesses

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Union Employer Establishments

14,260
Number of Establishments
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (14,260) is greater  than the previously measured value (13,996).
Prior Value
(13,996)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.