Search for Indicators
Demographics Dashboard
The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Union
Population
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Total Population
County: Union Total Population
572,726
People
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Union (572,726) is greater than the previously measured value (570,417).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(570,417)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Age and Sex
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Population Under Age 5
County: Union Population Under Age 5
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (5.6%), Union has a value of 6.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Union has a value of 6.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (6.0%) is less than the previously measured value (6.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population Under Age 18
County: Union Population Under Age 18
23.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (21.5%), Union has a value of 23.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Union has a value of 23.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (23.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(23.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population Over Age 65
County: Union Population Over Age 65
15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (17.4%), Union has a value of 15.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Union has a value of 15.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (15.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (14.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Female Population
County: Union Female Population
50.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (50.7%), Union has a value of 50.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Union has a value of 50.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (50.5%) is less than the previously measured value (50.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(50.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Male Population
County: Union Male Population
49.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (49.3%), Union has a value of 49.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Union has a value of 49.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (49.5%) is greater than the previously measured value (49.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Race and Hispanic Origin
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Population White
County: Union Population White
66.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (70.7%), Union has a value of 66.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Union has a value of 66.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (66.3%) is less than the previously measured value (66.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(66.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population Black or African American
County: Union Population Black or African American
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (15.4%), Union has a value of 24.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(15.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Union has a value of 24.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (24.0%) is greater than the previously measured value (23.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(23.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population American Indian and Alaska Native
County: Union Population American Indian and Alaska Native
1.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (0.7%), Union has a value of 1.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(0.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Union has a value of 1.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (1.0%) is greater than the previously measured value (0.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population Asian
County: Union Population Asian
6.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (10.5%), Union has a value of 6.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Union has a value of 6.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (6.2%) is greater than the previously measured value (6.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
County: Union Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (0.1%), Union has a value of 0.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Union has a value of 0.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (0.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population Two or More Races
County: Union Population Two or More Races
2.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (2.4%), Union has a value of 2.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Union has a value of 2.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (2.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population Hispanic or Latino
County: Union Population Hispanic or Latino
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (21.9%), Union has a value of 34.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Union has a value of 34.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (34.0%) is greater than the previously measured value (33.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(33.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
County: Union Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
37.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (52.9%), Union has a value of 37.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Union has a value of 37.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (37.6%) is less than the previously measured value (38.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Population Characteristics
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Veteran Population
County: Union Veteran Population
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (4.1%), Union has a value of 2.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Union has a value of 2.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Foreign Born Persons
County: Union Foreign Born Persons
31.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (23.2%), Union has a value of 31.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Union has a value of 31.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Housing
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Housing Units
County: Union Housing Units
211,919
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Union (211,919) is greater than the previously measured value (211,046).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(211,046)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Homeownership
County: Union Homeownership
54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (58.5%), Union has a value of 54.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Union has a value of 54.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Median Housing Unit Value
County: Union Median Housing Unit Value
$458,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $458,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $372,300 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $283,750.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($401,400), Union has a value of $458,000 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
($401,400)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Union has a value of $458,000 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
County: Union Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
$3,053
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $3,053 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,519 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,058.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($2,728), Union has a value of $3,053 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
NJ Value
($2,728)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Union has a value of $3,053 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
$1,390
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $1,390 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,085 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,327.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($1,175), Union has a value of $1,390 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
NJ Value
($1,175)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($584), Union has a value of $1,390 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Median Household Gross Rent
County: Union Median Household Gross Rent
$1,570
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $1,570 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,501 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,703.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($1,577), Union has a value of $1,570 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
NJ Value
($1,577)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Union has a value of $1,570 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Family & Living Arrangements
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Households
County: Union Households
199,996
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Average Household Size
County: Union Average Household Size
2.80
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (2.60), Union has a value of 2.80.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (2.60), Union has a value of 2.80.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
45.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (32.2%), Union has a value of 45.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Union has a value of 45.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Education
Value
Compared to:
County: Union People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Union People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
86.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 86.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 93.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 86.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (90.6%), Union has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Union has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Union People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
38.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 38.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (42.3%), Union has a value of 38.3% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Union has a value of 38.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Persons with a Disability
County: Union Persons with a Disability
9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the NJ Value (10.6%), Union has a value of 9.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
NJ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Union has a value of 9.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Persons with Health Insurance
County: Union Persons with Health Insurance
88.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 88.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 92.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 88.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (91.7%), Union has a value of 88.3% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (88.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(86.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Union
Economy
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Union Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
64.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 64.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 62.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 64.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (61.8%), Union has a value of 64.5% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
(61.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Union has a value of 64.5% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Union Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
63.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 60.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (60.9%), Union has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
NJ Value
(60.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Union has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Total Employment
County: Union Total Employment
187,879
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Union (187,879) is less than the previously measured value (205,090).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(205,090)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Total Employment Change
County: Union Total Employment Change
-8.4%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of -8.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than -6.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -8.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of -8.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (-6.5%), Union has a value of -8.4% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
(-6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Union has a value of -8.4% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Union (-8.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(0.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Union Mean Travel Time to Work
30.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 30.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.7.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 30.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (31.1), Union has a value of 30.6 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
NJ Value
(31.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (26.7), Union has a value of 30.6 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union
Income & Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Median Household Income
County: Union Median Household Income
$95,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $95,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $92,697 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $82,192.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of $95,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($97,126), Union has a value of $95,000 which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
($97,126)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Union has a value of $95,000 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union Per Capita Income
County: Union Per Capita Income
$49,666
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $49,666 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $49,666 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $42,448.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of $49,666 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value ($50,995), Union has a value of $49,666 which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
NJ Value
($50,995)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Union has a value of $49,666 which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Union People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Union People Living Below Poverty Level
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the NJ Value (9.7%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
![Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Union
Businesses
Value
Compared to:
County: Union Employer Establishments
County: Union Employer Establishments
13,996
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Union (13,996) is greater than the previously measured value (13,934).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(13,934)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.