Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Healthy New Jersey 2020: Progress Tracker

Healthy New Jersey 2020 is the state's health improvement plan and its health promotion and disease prevention agenda for the decade. 
 

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Warren

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
23.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 23.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 23.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (20.3), Warren has a value of 23.1 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(20.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Warren has a value of 23.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (23.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0).
Prior Value
(23.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (23.5), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(23.5)
<div><span>According to the American Cancer Society, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death and the second most common type of cancer among women in the U.S. The greatest risk factor in developing breast cancer is age. Since 1990, breast cancer death rates have declined progressively due to advancements in treatment and detection.</span></div>

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
155.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 155.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 142.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 160.6.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 155.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (141.0), Warren has a value of 155.6 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(141.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Warren has a value of 155.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (155.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (159.9).
Prior Value
(159.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (161.5), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(161.5)

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
11.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 11.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 11.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (13.0), Warren has a value of 11.2 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Warren has a value of 11.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (11.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.8).
Prior Value
(11.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (15.8), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(15.8)
<div><span>Colorectal cancer--cancer of the colon or rectum--is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if all adults aged 50 or older had regular screening tests for colon cancer, as many as 60% of the deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented. While 90% of colorectal cancer cases occur in adults aged 50 or older, it is essential for individuals with risk factors (those with a family history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or heavy alcohol use) to seek regular screening earlier.</span></div>

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
16.0
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 16.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (16.7), Warren has a value of 16.0 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Warren has a value of 16.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (16.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (21.2), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(21.2)
<div><span>According to the American Cancer Society, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer among men in the United States and it is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer-related death among men. The two greatest risk factors for prostate cancer are age and race/ethnicity, with men over the age of 65 and men of African descent possessing the highest incidence rates of prostate cancer in the U.S.</span></div>

County: Warren Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 6.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 20 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 6.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (7.4), Warren has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Warren has a value of 6.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (6.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2).
Prior Value
(7.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (7.2), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(7.2)
<div><span>Cervical cancer forms in tissues of the cervix. One out of every 145 women in the United States will be diagnosed in their lifetime. Early cervical cancer can be cured by removing or destroying the pre-cancerous or cancerous tissue. Human papillomavirus (HPV), which is transmitted through sexual contact, has been identified as the main cause of cervical cancer. In 2006, the FDA approved a new vaccine against HPV which prevents cervical cancer. In the United States in 2009, it is estimated that there were 11,270 new cases and 4,070 deaths from cervical cancer.</span></div>

County: Warren Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
42.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 42.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.0.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 42.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (38.7), Warren has a value of 42.5 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(38.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Warren has a value of 42.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (42.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.7).
Prior Value
(43.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (39.7), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(39.7)
<div><span>Colorectal cancer--cancer of the colon or rectum--is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. If adults aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60% of the deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented. In the U.S. in 2009, it is estimated that there were 106,100 new cases and 49,920 deaths from colorectal cancer.</span></div>

County: Warren

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
18.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 18.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (18.5), Warren has a value of 18.2 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Warren has a value of 18.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (18.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.6).
Prior Value
(17.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (15.8), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(15.8)
<div><span>Diabetes is a group of diseases marked by high levels of blood glucose, also called blood sugar, resulting from defects in insulin production, insulin action, or both. In 2007, diabetes was the seventh leading cause of death in the United States and an estimated 23.6 million people or 7.8% of the population had diabetes. The prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes increased sixfold in the latter half of the last century. Diabetes risk factors such as obesity and physical inactivity have played a major role in this dramatic increase. Age, race, and ethnicity are also important risk factors. </span><br /><br /><span>Diabetes can have a harmful effect on most of the organ systems in the human body; it is a frequent cause of end-stage renal disease, non-traumatic lower-extremity amputation, and a leading cause of blindness among working age adults. Persons with diabetes are also at increased risk for ischemic heart disease, neuropathy, and stroke. In economic terms, the direct medical expenditure attributable to diabetes in 2007 was estimated to be $116 billion.</span></div>

County: Warren

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

27.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 27.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.6), Warren has a value of 27.8 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(31.6)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Warren has a value of 27.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (27.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.5).
Prior Value
(25.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (28.6), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(28.6)
<div><span>Cerebrovascular diseases rank third among the leading causes of death in the U.S. Cerebrovascular disease can cause a stroke. A stroke occurs when blood vessels carrying oxygen to the brain become blocked or burst, thereby cutting off the brain's supply of oxygen. Lack of oxygen causes brain cells to die which can lead to death or disability. Each year, approximately 795,000 people in the U.S. will suffer a new or recurrent stroke. Although people of all ages may have strokes, the risk more than doubles with each decade of life after age 55. The most important modifiable risk factors for stroke are high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes mellitus.</span></div>

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
177.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 177.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 191.3.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (161.4), Warren has a value of 177.2 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(161.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (177.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (174.6).
Prior Value
(174.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (112.1), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(112.1)
<div> <div>Heart disease is a term that encompasses a variety of different diseases affecting the heart and is the leading cause of death in the United States accounting for 25.4% of total deaths. The most common type in the United States is coronary artery disease, which can cause heart attack, angina, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Coronary artery disease occurs when plaque builds up in the arteries that supply blood to the heart and the arteries narrow (atherosclerosis). There are many modifiable risk factors for atherosclerosis including tobacco smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and high levels of low-density lipoprotein in blood serum. Moreover, it is important to note that heart disease is the number one killer of women in the United States.</div> <div> </div> </div>

County: Warren

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.1.
NJ Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (3.7), Warren has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(3.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.5), Warren has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.5 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.9).
Prior Value
(0.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (3.5), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(3.5)
<div><span>Tuberculosis (TB) is a bacterial disease that usually affects the lungs, although other parts of the body can also be affected. The TB bacteria are spread through the air when a person with untreated pulmonary TB coughs or sneezes. Prolonged exposure to a person with untreated TB is usually necessary for infection to occur. In 9 out of 10 exposed people, the immune system halts the spread of the infection and the infected person does not become sick or spread disease to others. However, the bacilli remain dormant and can be activated if the immune system becomes severely weakened by HIV, diabetes, chemotherapy cancer treatments, or other causes. A person with TB disease is contagious until he/she has been on appropriate treatment for several days to weeks. The most important way to stop the spread of tuberculosis is for TB patients to cover the mouth and nose when coughing, and to take all TB medicine exactly as prescribed by their physician.</span></div>

County: Warren

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:
7.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (7.8%), Warren has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(7.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Warren has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (7.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (7.7%), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(7.7%)
<div><span>Babies born with a low birth weight are more likely than babies of normal weight to require specialized medical care, and often must stay in the intensive care unit. Low birth weight is often associated with premature birth. While there have been many medical advances enabling premature infants to survive, there is still risk of infant death or long-term disability. The most important things an expectant mother can do to prevent prematurity and low birth weight are to take prenatal vitamins, stop smoking, stop drinking alcohol and using drugs, and most importantly, get prenatal care.</span></div>

County: Warren Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
1.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (1.2%), Warren has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Warren has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (1.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (1.4%), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(1.4%)
<div><span>Babies born with a very low birth weight are more likely than babies of normal weight to require specialized medical care and often must stay in intensive care nurseries. Low birth weight is often associated with premature birth. Babies born at very low birth weight are at the highest risk of dying in their first year. While there have been many medical advances enabling very low birth weight and premature infants to survive, there is still risk of infant death or long-term disability. To prevent prematurity and low birth weight, expectant mothers should take prenatal vitamins, stop smoking, stop drinking alcohol and using drugs, and most importantly, get prenatal care.</span></div>

County: Warren Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Warren Infant Mortality Rate

8.0
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2015-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (4.4), Warren has a value of 8.0 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.9), Warren has a value of 8.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (8.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6).
Prior Value
(8.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the NJ 2020 (4.8), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(4.8)
<div><span>Infant mortality rate continues to be one of the most widely used indicators of the overall health status of a community. The leading causes of death among infants are birth defects, pre-term delivery, low birth weight, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), and maternal complications during pregnancy.</span></div>

County: Warren Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
80.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 80.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.1%.
NJ Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (72.5%), Warren has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(72.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.3%), Warren has a value of 80.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (80.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.6%).
Prior Value
(83.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (79.4%), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(79.4%)
<div><span><span>Babies born to mothers who do not receive prenatal care are three times more likely to have a low birth weight and five times more likely to die than those born to mothers who do get care. Early prenatal care (i.e. care in the first trimester of a pregnancy) allows women and their health care providers to identify and, when possible, treat or correct health problems and health-compromising behaviors that can be particularly damaging during the initial stages of fetal development. Increasing the number of women who receive prenatal care, and who do so early in their pregnancies, can improve birth outcomes and lower health care costs by reducing the likelihood of complications during pregnancy and childbirth.</span></span></div>

County: Warren

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
8.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 8.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (7.3), Warren has a value of 8.2 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(7.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Warren has a value of 8.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (8.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.4).
Prior Value
(9.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the NJ 2020 (5.9), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(5.9)
<div><span>Suicide is a major, preventable public health problem. In 2007, suicide was the 11th leading cause of death in the United States. Based on 2007 age-adjusted death rates, men were nearly four times more likely to die of suicide than females, and white individuals were over two times more likely to die of suicide than black or Hispanic individuals. Older Americans are disproportionately likely to die by suicide. An estimated eight to 25 attempted suicides occur for every suicide death.</span></div>

County: Warren

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings

30.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 30.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 52.4.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.5), Warren has a value of 30.4 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(31.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.3), Warren has a value of 30.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(28.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (30.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.9).
Prior Value
(32.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (6.8), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(6.8)

County: Warren

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Warren Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

31.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 31.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 31.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (31.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (23.8%), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(23.8%)
<div><span>The percentage of obese adults is an indicator of the overall health and lifestyle of a community. Obesity increases the risk of many diseases and health conditions including heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, cancer, hypertension, stroke, liver and gallbladder disease, respiratory problems, and osteoarthritis. Losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight help to prevent and control these diseases. Being obese also carries significant economic costs due to increased healthcare spending and lost earnings.</span></div>